The recent PBS News Hour interview of an author of the Washington Post article ("Doctors who put lives at risk with covid misinformation rarely punished" by Lena H. Sun, Lauren Weber and Hayden Godfrey) is a case in point - an example of a manufactured event.
The authors cleverly focused on whether the doctors targeted by state medical boards for "misinformation" were punished rather than whether the information was in fact misinformation - primarily about treating with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine which the authors repeatedly say conclusively are proved to be ineffective (untrue). The assumptions were those patients were more likely to die (untrue) because the doctors actually treated people with these licensed, safe & effective drugs at a time when the CDC advice was that there was no treatment, and again later in lieu of the more costly designer drugs which had high incidence of adverse reactions. In fact, there were very good results for early treatment with these drugs using various protocols that are still not considered by NIH/FDA or CDC.
The goal of the WaPo and PBS is to cause an emotional reaction among the general population against doctors who don't toe the line - to the point of robbing them of their livelihood. Again, truth, rights and even lives don't matter. Serving the narcissistic agenda and reinforcing the false world view is the "win."
This is a set-up just like the set-up with the chair.
The recent PBS News Hour interview of an author of the Washington Post article ("Doctors who put lives at risk with covid misinformation rarely punished" by Lena H. Sun, Lauren Weber and Hayden Godfrey) is a case in point - an example of a manufactured event.
The authors cleverly focused on whether the doctors targeted by state medical boards for "misinformation" were punished rather than whether the information was in fact misinformation - primarily about treating with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine which the authors repeatedly say conclusively are proved to be ineffective (untrue). The assumptions were those patients were more likely to die (untrue) because the doctors actually treated people with these licensed, safe & effective drugs at a time when the CDC advice was that there was no treatment, and again later in lieu of the more costly designer drugs which had high incidence of adverse reactions. In fact, there were very good results for early treatment with these drugs using various protocols that are still not considered by NIH/FDA or CDC.
The goal of the WaPo and PBS is to cause an emotional reaction among the general population against doctors who don't toe the line - to the point of robbing them of their livelihood. Again, truth, rights and even lives don't matter. Serving the narcissistic agenda and reinforcing the false world view is the "win."
This is a set-up just like the set-up with the chair.